Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
MILLS v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00104
Petitioner: CORY MILLS
Respondent: PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TESCH v. MILLS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00012
Plaintiff: ANDREW CHRISTOPHER TESCH
Defendant: DARRELL MILLS, STEVE KNIGHT, SANDS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRAY v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2009cv00005
Plaintiff: BRENTON LLOYD GRAY
Defendant: GLENN JACKSON, BRUCE WILKERSON, MARK GRUBE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALEXANDER v. MILLS et al
as 4:2008cv00212
Plaintiff: BLAKE M. ALEXANDER
Defendant: DARRELL MILLS and FLOYD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GUM v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00190
Plaintiff: STEPHEN M. GUM, JR.
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TURNER v. MILLS et al
as 4:2008cv00132
Plaintiff: CHARLES DOUGLAS TURNER
Defendant: DARRELL MILLS, ROBBIE WOODRUFF and KILE SMITH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BOWERS v. HARBIN et al
as 4:2008cv00111
Plaintiff: STEVEN WILLIAM BOWERS
Defendant: PATRICIA HARBIN, A. J. VISSING, C MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBY v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00107
Plaintiff: DUWARD T. ROBY
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv00591
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MILLS
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2008cv00346
Petitioner: TODD MILLS
Respondent: STANELY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?