Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Bosarge v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Milton Wayne Bosarge
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Council, Ed Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton v. Valley
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Bishop Patrick Michael Milton
Defendant:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gress v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2023cv01792
Plaintiff:
Milton II Gress
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Steven Horseford, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlefield v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyler Littlefield
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Michelle Duncan, Jason Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kingdom v. Herrera
as 2:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Miltonous Q. Kingdom
Defendant:
G. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gress v. Sisolak
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Milton Gress, II
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander-Campos v. Reinke et al
as 4:2022cv05253
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Alexander-Campos, lll and Robert E. Samuel
Defendant:
Benjermin Reinke, Thomas Walsh, Joseph Eichhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Milton v. Trate et al
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
Kyle David Milton
Defendant:
B. M. Trate, R. Paltenghi and Dr. Grassely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Milton v. Trate et al
as 1:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
Kyle David Milton
Defendant:
B.M. Trate, R. Paltenghi and Grassely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
