Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant: BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff: JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant: merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morris v. Trump
as 23-456
Plaintiff / Appellant: Keith S. Morris
Defendant / Appellee: President Donald Trump, Comm. Andrew M. Saul, of Social Security, Nancy A. Berryhill, Dep. Comm. of Social Security and others
Defendant: A.L.J. Roxanne Fuller, A.G. William P. Barr, Department of Labor, Secretary of State (N.Y.) and others
Justin et al v. Tingling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10370
Plaintiff: Mr. Daudi Justin, Community Service Society, Daudi Justin and others
Defendant: Milton Adair Tingling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Eisele
as 22-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ronnie Ramael Todd, Moor beneficiary Ramael Black Well El Trust a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal new yorker national, and Subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee: Brett Eisele, Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 et al.,, Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State et al.,, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security et al., and others
Todd v. Eisele et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06968
Plaintiff: Ronnie Ramael Todd
Defendant: Brett Eisele, Antony Blinken, Alejandra Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray v. Tingling
as 18-1642
Plaintiff - Appellant: Willie Murray, AKA Jeffery Lashley
Defendant - Appellee: Milton Adair Tingling, Clerk of the Court Criminal Court of The City of New York
Sun v. New York State Attorney Genera
as 17-3697
Plaintiff - Appellant: Xiu Jian Sun, Servant of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; The Spiritual Adam
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Attorney General, Charles F. Sanders, (Wang Xing Ren), Michael Siudzinski, (Wang Xing Ren) & Office of the Attorney General of NY and others
Sun et al v. State of New York Office of the Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv05916
Defendant: 109 Precinct and 2 Female Enforcement Police Officers from 109 Precinct, Alfonse D'Amato Federal Courthouse, Attorney Generals Office of Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Pharisee: Akwei Oko Acquaye, Aprilanne Agostino, Thomas P. Aliotta and others
Wang Xing Ren: Aron M. Bloom, Daniele Dezago, Sean P. Greene and others
Wand Xing Ren: Robert L. Capers
Plaintiff: Xiu Jian Sun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maxwell v. Vance et al
as 1:2017cv01644
Plaintiff: Jerome Maxwell
Defendant: Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Marquez Brooks, Milton Adair Tingling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?