Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Diane Catherine Gavin v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-3404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Diane Catherine Gavin
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, City of Apple Valley, City of Arlington and others
Babu v. Becker, City of et al
as 0:2014cv04471
Plaintiff:
Nadine Babu
Defendant:
Becker, City of, Benton County, Blaine, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Wallace Sherno v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-3288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Wallace Sherno
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, City of Apple Valley, City of Arlington and others
Cynthya Lou Porter v. City of Brooklyn Park, et al
as 14-3188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cynthya Lou Porter
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Brooklyn Park, City of Caledonia, City of Goodview and others
Sarah Kristine Tichich v. City of Bloomington, et al
as 14-3151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sarah Kristine Tichich
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Bloomington, City of Cannon Falls, City of Lakeville and others
Michelle Mary Ray v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-2964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michelle Mary Ray
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, City of Big Lake, City of Bloomington and others
Marquardt v. Auto Save, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv02958
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marquardt
Defendant:
Auto Save, Inc., Blaine, City of , Bloomington, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandyn Phillips v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 14-2160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brandyn Phillips
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Jane Lanwehr, supervising director, Mona Dolman, Commissioner and others
Brian Potocnik v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-1974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brian Potocnik
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, Dakota County, Hennepin County and others
Johanna McDonough v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-1754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johanna Beth McDonough
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, Benton County, City of Bloomington and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
