Cases 1 - 10 of 29
LIN v. LEES HOUSE RESTAURANT INC et al
as 2:2023cv03111
Defendant:
SEN LIN, LEES HOUSE RESTAURANT INC doing business as LEE'S HOUSE, SHEN LIN and others
Plaintiff:
MIN HUI LIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
MIN v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH Y. MIN
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON, SUPERINTENDENT OF ACJ and MEDICAL DEPT. OF ACJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. LAM et al
as 2:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
CAMILLA BROWN
Defendant:
PING LAM and MIN XIAO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
KASUNICK v. CAI
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN KASUNICK
Defendant:
MIN CAI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MITCHELL v. STEPMAN et al
as 2:2021cv00942
Plaintiff:
JUWAN EVRICK MITCHELL
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. STEPMAN, MARCELL BROWN, DREA MIN BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEE v. 1333 ENTERPRISE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00182
Defendant:
YONG S CHOI and 1333 ENTERPRISE, INC.
Plaintiff:
HAN MIN LEE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
CHMIEL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01691
Defendant:
CHCA WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. MIN HI PARK, DR. SMYTH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHMIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO BAEZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , BYUNGHAK JIN , MIN HI PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HTUT v. LANE et al
as 5:2017cv04021
Petitioner:
WIN MIN HTUT
Respondent:
JAY LANE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITENIGHT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01864
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WHITENIGHT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JOHN/JANE DOE, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
