Cases 21 - 30 of 66
United States of America v. Olson et al
as 9:2018cv00188
Defendant:
Thomas A. Olson, Bank of America, N.A., Laurie A. Olson and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Grady v. Missoula County Detention Facility
as 9:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
Adam O. Grady
Defendant:
Missoula County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kittrell v. Missoula County Detention Facility
as 9:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Toby Kittrell
Defendant:
Missoula County Detention Facility and Cole Moden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Missoula County Detention Facility Mail Staff et al
as 9:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Calvin Brooks
Defendant:
Missoula County Detention Facility Mail Staff, Correctional Officer Harris and Tera Tackett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wick v. Fellman et al
as 9:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Randy Bryant Wick
Defendant:
Ted Fellman, David Stenerson, Missoula County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wick v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Randy Bryant Wick
Defendant:
State of Montana, Missoula County, Officer Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wick v. Missoula County et al
as 9:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Randy Bryant Wick
Defendant:
Missoula County, State of Montana, Mark Kittleson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keefe v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jordan Keefe
Defendant:
State of Montana, Missoula County, Sandra Fairbanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. C/O Nash et al
as 9:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Dean
Defendant:
C/O Nash and Missoula County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Birdsong et al
as 9:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Malcolm Wayne Birdsong, M.W. Birdsong, Waynes' Group and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
