Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Fuemmeler v. Precythe et al
as 5:2021cv06021
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Amanda Warner, Anne L. Precythe and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Fuemmeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv04163
Plaintiff:
Troy Dewany Knight
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Algoa Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
as 4:2016cv01322
Petitioner:
Steven G Smith
Respondent:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. Smyth et al
as 4:2016cv00292
Petitioner:
Larry A White
Respondent:
Kelly Smyth and Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradin v. Bowersox et al
as 6:2015cv03525
Petitioner:
John Bradin
Respondent:
Michael Bowersox, Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ausler v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 6:2015cv03305
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ausler
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, John Brower and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation, et al
as 15-1874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Defendant:
John Doe, (#1-99)
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Williams v. MO Bd. of Probation & Parole
as 14-3860
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven Lydell Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
Neill v. Beetem et al
as 2:2014cv04169
Plaintiff:
Krisda J. Neill
Defendant:
Jon E Beetem, Thomas Chapman, Jeremiah Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
