Cases 1 - 6 of 6
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bautista et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv02842
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez Bautista and Jose Luis Gomez
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc, Mitsubishi Motors Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woody v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc et al
as 7:2010cv01874
Plaintiff:
Donna W Woody
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc, Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America Inc and CenterOne Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Panzer et al v. Grand Strand Nissan Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00280
Plaintiff:
John H Panzer and Londa M Panzer
Defendant:
Grand Strand Nissan Inc, Mitsubishi Motor North America Inc, Mitsubishi Motor North America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America Inc v. Suzuki Outlet of Myrtle Beach SC LLC et al
as 4:2008cv03393
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America Inc
Defendant:
Suzuki Outlet of Myrtle Beach SC LLC doing business as Myrtle Beach Mitsubishi and Alexander Barletta
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ESTATE OF ALEXANDER DAVID SETTLE et al v. MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00727
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ALEXANDER DAVID SETTLE and M. SCOTT SETTLE
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES OF AMERICA, INC., MITSUBISHI MOTORS R&D OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
