Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Mixson v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
James E. Mixson, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Lamar Thompson and Panther II Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mixson v. Warden Janson
as 2:2023cv01618
Petitioner:
Rondall Clyde Mixson
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mixson
as 2:2019cv00185
Petitioner:
Daniel R Mixson, Sr
Claimant:
Fletcher Coleman Compton
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30511
Mixson v. Waid et al
as 0:2018cv02626
Defendant:
Randolph Waid, Alexander McDold and Micheal Cross
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Respondent:
Alexander McDonald and Chad B. Simpson
Petitioner:
Daniel Mixson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mixson v. Trident Eye Surgery Center LP et al
as 2:2017cv00563
Plaintiff:
Marcy Mixson
Defendant:
Trident Eye Surgery Center LP , Columbia HCA Healthcare Corporation of South Carolina and HCA Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Mixson v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
as 0:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixson v. State of South Carolina
as 0:2015cv04555
Petitioner:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Respondent:
Director, Charleston County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Westfield Insurance Company v. KMAC of the Carolinas Inc et al
as 2:2015cv03672
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
KMAC of the Carolinas Inc, Samet Corporation and Flats at Mixson LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mixson v. State of South Carolina et al
as 0:2014cv02004
Petitioner:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Respondent:
Al Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
