Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Diamond v. Mobile Housing Board
as 1:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Baird et al
as 1:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Mobile Housing, Legal Service and C. Jame Baird
Plaintiff:
Charles Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Scott v. Lawson et al
as 1:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Deloris Scott
Defendant:
Lawanda Lawson, Mobile Housing Board, Penelope Slawkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donavette Ely, et al. v. Mobile Housing Board et al
as 1:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Donavette Ely
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board, Barbara Mitchell and Kimberly Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ely v. Mobile Housing Board et al
as 1:2015cv00565
Plaintiff:
Devin Ely
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board, Barbara Mitchell and Sharon Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Criswell et al v. Mobile Housing Board
as 1:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ty Criswell , Ronald Coffman , Eric Knight and others
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Franklin et al v. Mobile Housing Board
as 1:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Frederick E. Franklin and Sylvia Franklin
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mobile Housing Board v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00226
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Plaintiff:
Mobile Housing Board
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Ely v. Mobile Housing Board
as 1:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Donavette Ely
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Badri v. Mobile Housing Board et al
as 1:2011cv00328
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Badri
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board , Tyronnda Bethune and Cottage Hill Pointe
Counter_claimant:
Mobile Housing Board
Counter_defendant:
Mohammed Badri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
