Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mock v. Tompkins Community Bank
as 3:2022cv00995
Plaintiff:
Stacy Mock
Defendant:
Tompkins Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Freeman et al v. HSBC Holdings PLC et al
as 1:2018cv07359
Defendant:
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited, HSBC Holdings PLC, HSBC Bank PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marvise L. Crockett, Daniel Carvill, Kristin Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pochinsky v. Standard AVB Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv10176
Defendant:
Timothy K. Zimmerman, Terence L. Graft, Gregory J. Saxon and others
Plaintiff:
Philip A. Pochinsky
Mock v. Fairfield Residential Company, LLC
as 1:2014cv09048
Plaintiff:
Elmer Mock
Defendant:
Fairfield Residential Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mock v. USA
as 1:2014cv02631
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Wasang T. Mock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanders et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02228
Plaintiff:
Brittany Sanders, Adelaide Polidori and Freida Mock
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mock et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02193
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Debbie Mock and Tony Mock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mock v. The City of Rome et al
as 6:2010cv00919
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Mock
Defendant:
The City of Rome and The City of Rome Police Department
Cause Of Action: Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
