Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03371
Plaintiff:
Omer Mohamed
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohamed et al v. Denver County School District 1 et al
as 1:2023cv03112
Defendant:
Denver County School District 1, Denver Public Schools, Alex Marrero and others
Plaintiff:
Safia Mohamed, Mohamed Ibrahim and Suad Ahmed
Peterson et al v. Osman et al
as 1:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Jeanine Lee Peterson, Margaret Jean Stebbins and Amanda Lynn Peterson
Defendant:
Ahmed Mohamed Osman, Shakta Transportation LLC and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States v. Elliott
as 23-1331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MOHAMMED AKIM ELLIOTT
United States v. Elliott
as 23-1581
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MOHAMMED AKIM ELLIOTT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
