Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mares et al v. City of Dayton
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Moises Mares and Maribel Trevizo
Defendant:
City of Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tigert v. Rogers et al
as 2:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Moises Rodriguez, Tyrone Rogers and Judy Perez
Plaintiff:
Pal Tigert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FILING ERROR
as 7:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
Moises B. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Close v. Martinez
as 7:2015cv00237
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
Moises B. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mercado et al v. Dallas County, Texas et al
as 3:2015cv03481
Plaintiff:
Arturo Mercado , Pablo Carranza , Sergio Diaz and others
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas and Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KMH, LLC et al v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2013cv01046
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Edward Perez, Daniel Delagarza Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hack, Gary Hack, KMH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Adamore v. City of Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2012cv03091
Plaintiff:
Lorrine Adamore
Defendant:
City of Houston Police Department, Anise Parker, Charles McClelland and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Cantu v. Nichols et al
as 4:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
Moises Cantu
Defendant:
John F Nichols and John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Salas et al v. County et al
as 1:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Moises M Salas , Nathaniel C Perez, Jr , Star Jones and others
Defendant:
Cameron County , The Office of the Cameron County District Attorney and District Attorney Armando Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
