Cases 21 - 30 of 250
USA v. Chavez-Saldana
as 22-10864
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Moises Chavez-Saldana
Ortiz v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02877
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ortiz
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Moises Villalobos, Jr., Dana C. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02849
Petitioner:
Larry Author Mills
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Defendant:
Moises Villalobos and Keauna Seaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02489
Plaintiff:
Rosalba Rodriguez, Jesus Nevarez, Adrian Garcia Perez and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Romero et al v. Elon, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02434
Plaintiff:
Moises Romero, Jarret Malone and Jovan Dunlap
Defendant:
Elon, LLC, Levi Leatham and Elon, LLC doing business as Kindred Pest Control
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Valero v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02272
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Valero
Defendant:
Brian Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Moises Villalobos, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 3:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Moises Garcia, Jr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Moises Garcia, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fidelity Life Association v. Ntui et al
as 4:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Fidelity Life Association
Defendant:
Arrah Frida Ntui, Arrah Moise Oneke, A. T. M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Martinez Moises v. Garland
as 22-60297
Petitioner:
Carlos Martinez Moises
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
