Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. $6,000.00 in Western Union Money Orders, et al
as 5:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$6,000.00 in Western Union Money Orders, MONEY GRAM MONEY ORDER, $15,700.00 IN WESTERN UNION MONEY ORDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Approximately 36 Western Union Money Orders et al
as 3:2016cv00860
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately 36 Western Union Money Orders and Approximately 2 Money Gram Money Orders
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately $49,849.02 in Funds et al
as 3:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $49,849.02 in Funds, Approximately $5,559 in United States Currency and Two United States Postal Service Money Orders
Claimant:
Pawnee Leasing Corporation and Pentagon Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 357 Assorted Money Orders et al
as 1:2013cv00329
Defendant:
357 Assorted Money Orders, $10,000 in United States Currency, 77 Assorted Money Orders and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY, $94,200.00 IN U.S. et al
as 1:2011cv00609
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY, $94,200.00 IN U.S. and SIX (6) WESTERN UNION MONEY ORDERS WITH A TOTAL VALUE OF $3,700.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
Claimant:
Fatuma Salih
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY, $52,305.00 IN U.S. et al
as 1:2009cv00454
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY, $52,305.00 IN U.S. and $4,200.00 IN ASSORTED MONEY ORDERS
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00306
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
