Cases
LawHQ, LLC et al v. Dopico et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00616
Defendant: Diana Maxfield Kearse, Cydney A. Kelly, Jorge Dopico and others
Plaintiff: LawHQ, LLC and Thomas Alvord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neroni v. Zayas
as 14-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant: Frederick J. Neroni
Defendant - Appellee: Steven D. Zayas, Attorney, Committee of Professional Standards, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 3rd Judicial Department, In his official and individual capacity, Karen Peters, in her official capacity as Chief Justice of New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, Monica A. Duffy, Chairperson, Committee of Professional Standards, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 3rd Judicial Department, in her official capacity and others
Peters v. Neroni
as 13-4772
Plaintiff - Appellee: Karen Peters, Chief Judge, New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Judicial Department, in her official capacity and Monica A. Duffy, Chairperson, COMMITTEE FOR PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Judicial Department, in her official capacity
Defendant - Appellant: Tatiana Neroni
Peters, et al v. Neroni We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00180
Defendant: Tatiana Neroni
Plaintiff: Karen Peters and Monica A. Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neroni v. Zayas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00127
Plaintiff: Frederick J. Neroni
Defendant: Steven D. Zayas, Karen Peters, Monica A. Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roosa v. Ochs et al
as 3:2010cv00471
Plaintiff: David Charles Roosa
Defendant: Mark S. Ochs, Committee On Professional Standards, Steven D. Zayas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?