Cases 11 - 17 of 17
PERRON et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2012cv01853
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE M. JACKSON and STEPHEN H. PERRON
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
IANTOSCA et al v. BENISTAR ADMIN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011mc00066
Plaintiff:
BELLEMORE ASSOCIATES, LLC, BELRIDGE CORPORATION, GAIL A. CAHALY and others
Interested Party:
BENEFIT CONCEPT, INC., BENEFIT CONCEPTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., BENISTAR ADMIN SERVICES EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN and others
Defendant:
BENISTAR 419 PLAN SERVICES, INC, BENISTAR ADMIN SERVICES, INC., BENISTAR EMPLOYER SERVICES TRUST CORPORATION and others
Third Party Defendant:
WAYNE H. BURSEY
Third Party Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. GEORGE et al
as 1:2010cv01094
Defendant:
DAVID M. GEORGE, ROBYN R. GEORGE, HART FINANCIAL and others
Plaintiff:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
INDIANA COMMUNITY BUSINESS CREDIT CORPORATION v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00845
Plaintiff:
INDIANA COMMUNITY BUSINESS CREDIT CORPORATION
Defendant:
INTEGRATED, LLC and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
SUSKOVICH v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2010mc00089
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. FEIWELL, MURRAY J. FEIWELL, FEIWELL & HANNOY, P.C./DEBT COLLECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
KATHY JO SUSKOVICH
AVENTINE RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC. v. E-BIOFUELS, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00385
Plaintiff:
AVENTINE RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC. and AVENTINE RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Defendant:
E-BIOFUELS, LLC and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
