Cases 1 - 10 of 16
LaRoe v. Twomey et al
as 3:2024cv30059
Plaintiff:
Pro se Litigant Kelly LaRoe
Defendant:
Paula Twomey, Jefferey Riley, Bureau of Special Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gill v. Town of Marshfield et al
as 1:2020cv10431
Defendant:
Kevin Morris, Cristin Caufield, Philip Tavares and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Demos et al
as 1:2019cv10425
Defendant:
Massachusetts State Police, Kevin P. Shea, Barbara Dortch-Okara and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos-Martinez v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2016cv40128
Plaintiff:
Jose A Burgos-Martinez
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Gary J Gemme , Steven Roche and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sullivan, III v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2014cv14299
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Sullivan, III
Defendant:
Caitlin E. Flaherty, Kevin Morris, Kimberly Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Town of Hanover et al
as 1:2014cv14183
Plaintiff:
Angela A. Morris
Defendant:
Town of Hanover, Hanover Police Department and Paul J. Torino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2014cv40164
Plaintiff:
Michael Morris
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Matthew Tivnan, Dave Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Feldman v. Woodlock et al
as 1:2014cv12279
Plaintiff:
Debra Feldman
Defendant:
Douglas P. Woodlock, News Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2013cv40064
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Smith
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Gary J. Gemme, Terrence Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B.W. v. Springfield School Committee
as 3:2012cv30224
Plaintiff:
Rhodlyn Thomas
Defendant:
Springfield School Committee, City of Springfield, Alan Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
