Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Mansell v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2017cv00851
Defendant:
Sr Trooper Grays, Mesa, Morrow County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Samuel Mansell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Hascall et al
as 2:2017cv00785
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, Kim Brockamp, City of Pendleton, County of Umatilla, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engweiler v. Morrow et al
as 6:2016cv01994
Defendant:
Theresa Arendell, Taynia Beal, Brenda Carney and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad R. Engweiler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Morrow County et al
as 2:2015cv00858
Defendant:
Morrow County and Karen Wolff
Plaintiff:
Denise Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Engweiler v. Morrow et al
as 6:2014cv01917
Defendant:
Theresa Arendell, Taynia Beal, Brenda Carney and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad R. Engweiler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrow v. Wright Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01119
Defendant:
Steve Birnbaum, John Doe Company, Wright Medical Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin A. Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Perryman v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00719
Defendant:
SGT. Aconda, Sgt. Bauer, Lt. Burchett and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Perryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagen v. Williams et al
as 6:2014cv00165
Defendant:
Judy Gilmore, Mitch Morrow, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Benson v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00132
Defendant:
Cpl. Akers, B. Anana, Archer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Benson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairley v. Shelton et al
as 2:2014cv00030
Defendant:
Kenneth Becker, Daniel Dewsnup, C. DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Fairley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
