Cases 1 - 10 of 118
GREEN v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GREEN
Defendant:
LARRY KRASNER, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO, JUDGE MOSS BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. P/O SEDLER #7592 et al
as 2:2023cv02632
Petitioner:
TERRANCE GREEN
Respondent:
P/O SEDLER #7592, JUDGE MOSS, LARRY KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HADNAGY v. MOSS et al
as 2:2022cv03060
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. HADNAGY
Defendant:
JEFF MOSS and DEF CON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MOSES v. PATRICK GECKLE, ESQ.
as 2:2022cv03027
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MOSES and SHAWN MOSS
Defendant:
PATRICK GECKLE, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor v. Levan et al
as 1:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
William Victor
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Levan, Correctional Officer Macijckak, Correctional Officer Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MOSS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
DONTE ANTIONNE MOSS
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH, COUNTY EXECUTIVE RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
HEBA ELOHIM and DONTE ANTIONNE MOSS
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Kertes et al
as 1:2021cv02157
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
H. Kertes, John Wetzel, Kevin Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Moss et al
as 3:2021cv01416
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Smith
Defendant:
J. Moss and S. Gavlick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
