Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Scott v. Moyer et al
as 1:2018cv05906
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Defendant:
John Moyer, Marc Grammes, Matthew M. Osterberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03401
Plaintiff:
Dennis Adams
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, Detective Clyde Moyer, Detective Matthew Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv06911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Itkin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Defendant:
City of New York, Stacy Meigs, Police Officer Clyde Moyer and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Itkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Grandison et al v. Sante Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01464
Plaintiff:
Danae Grandison, Michael Laboon and Dave Moyer
Defendant:
Reynolds American, Inc. and Sante Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gondola v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00369
Plaintiff:
Gondola and Luis Gondola
Defendant:
City of New York, Dmitriy Shery, Joseph Ryan and others
Not Classified By Court:
Judah Greenblatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Overseas Private Investment Corporation v. Moyer et al
as 1:2015cv08171
Plaintiff:
Overseas Private Investment Corporation
Defendant:
David Lewis Moyer and Antonio Raul Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodman v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04042
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moyer-Hansen v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00406
Plaintiff:
Lezlie Jo Moyer-Hansen
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
