Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Solomon v. Meyer et al
as 5:2011cv02827
Plaintiff:
Vincente Urain Solomon
Defendant:
G. Lewis, Dornan, Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shrader et al v. Devincenzi et al
as 5:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
Ted L. Shrader and Susan E Murray
Defendant:
Robert Devincenzi , Donald Mattson , Albert Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Miller v. Devincenzi et al
as 5:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
Henry Miller
Defendant:
Robert Devincenzi , Bernard Bailey , Donald Mattson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CorZac Inc. v. The City & County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
CorZac Inc.
Defendant:
The City & County of San Francisco , The Port of San Francisco , Monique Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moyer v. Encore Recievable Management, Inc.,
as 5:2009cv04863
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Moyer
Defendant:
Encore Recievable Management, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Location Based Technologies v. Dalsgaard et al
as 3:2009cv01618
Plaintiff:
Location Based Technologies and Location Based Technologies
Defendant:
Jens Dalsgaard, Redwood Consultants LLC, Constellation Capital Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martinez et al v. Romaguera et al
as 3:2008cv01701
Plaintiff:
Martin Martinez, Jesus Soto, Rene Castro and others
Defendant:
Herman M. Romaguera, Carmen Hall Soruco, Jose Muro and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moyers v. Curry
as 3:2008cv01707
Petitioner:
Raul Moyers
Respondent:
B. Curry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pruitt et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv01620
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Pruitt, Charlotte Moyer and Lola McClintock
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
