Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Marcus Terrell v. Warden Dooly State Prison, et al
as 24-10577
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN DOOLY STATE PRISON, PAUL, LUCAS and others
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. SEALS et al
as 5:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN SEALS, PAUL, LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 6:2022cv01227
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Smith, Justin White, Capt. Ms. Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Alessandro v. Eddins et al
as 3:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. D'Alessandro, III
Defendant:
Robin Noel Eddins, Kara Carter, Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv01375
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Donway, Mr. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Scott E. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. BALDWIN STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2020cv00123
Defendant:
MR PROSSER, MR MARTIN, MR TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venneau v. Woodard et al
as 6:2019cv01065
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Venneau
Defendant:
Ms. Randolph, Ms. Dudshoff, Ms. Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez DelReal et al v. Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation Department et al
as 1:2019cv21827
Defendant:
Mr. Smith, Mr. Mir, Mr. Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Breton, Jonnathan Alvarez DelReal, Anthony Touzet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 6:2018cv00842
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dewayne Booth
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Jefferson S Dunn, J Watson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
