Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Muhammad v. USA
as 1:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Rasheed Ali Muhammad
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hashim v. Barr
as 5:2019cv00077
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Muhammad Hashim
Defendant:
William Barr
Respondent:
Warden Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barker v. Watson et al
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Barker
Defendant:
Unknown Watson, John Does, Unknown Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. USA
as 1:2017cv00023
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rasheed Ali Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Eberline v. Media Net LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Steven Eberline and Chester McCoy
Defendant:
Media Net LLC , Muhammad Ateeq and Mykhaylo Kalyn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Shakir et al
as 2:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Chase Home Finance, LLC
Defendant:
David Shakir, Nationwide Trustee Services, Inc., Muhammad Abdur-Rahman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Al-Zulu v. East Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Shakaa Daniel Muhammad Al-Zulu
Defendant:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility, GEO Group, Inc., Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Muhammad et al
as 3:2007cv00500
Plaintiff:
Eric Tremaine Williams
Defendant:
Yasmeen D. Muhammad, Wonda Ware, Andrea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 3:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
Melinda Robinson, Melinda Robinson, Melinda Robinson and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
