Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv05760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gold 'N Stones, Inc. v. MNQ Jewelers LLC
as 4:2025cv00654
Defendant:
Muhammad Hassan and MNQ Jewelers LLC d/b/a Royal Jewelers #2
Plaintiff:
Gold 'N Stones, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Moodie et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
Brittany Moodie and Muhammad Hassan
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HASSAN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2023cv02278
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD HASSAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
