Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv03000
Plaintiff:
Jerome Murray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mills v. City of Winona et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Murray Mills
Defendant:
City of Winona, Officer James Burnett, Officer Orlando Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murray v. MS. State Parole Board
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Hayes Murray
Defendant:
MS. State Parole Board
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Fulgham v. DuPuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Murray G. Fulgham
Defendant:
DuPuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy Inc., Depuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. City of Madison, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Officer Randy Tyler, Investigator Charles Harrison, III, SRT Commander Captain Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Moab v. Bresky et al
as 2:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Murray Bresky, Joe Frank Sanderson, Lana Crandell and others
Plaintiff:
Rodne' Davis-Moab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Matthew Murray
Defendant:
Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
