Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Myriad Women's Health Inc v. Kartikeyan
as 2:2025cv00517
Plaintiff:
Myriad Genetics and Myriad Women's Health Inc
Defendant:
Ramya Kartikeyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc80258
Respondent:
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc., Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. and others
Hager v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc80261
Respondent:
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc., Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Alicia Hager
E. et al v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
R. E. and A. E.
Defendant:
Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah, Myriad Genetics Benefits Manager and Myriad Genetics CDHP Medical Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Carroll v. Myriad Genetics Inc.
as 4:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Ashley Carroll
Defendant:
Myriad Genetics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Marcey v. Capone et al
as 1:2021cv01320
Plaintiff:
Karen Marcey
Defendant:
Mark C. Capone, Bryan M. Dechairo, R. Bryan Riggsbee and others
Nominal Defendant:
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Ravgen, Inc. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01730
Defendant:
Myriad Women's Health, Inc. and Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ravgen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. et al v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah et al
as 2:2019cv01006
Defendant:
Myriad Genetics Inc. Health & Welfare Benefit Plan, the and Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah
Plaintiff:
C. H. and Larry H.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Silverman v. Myriad Genetics et al
as 2:2019cv00707
Defendant:
Myriad Genetics, R. Bryan Riggsbee and Mark C. Capone
Plaintiff:
Ethan Silverman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
