Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jackson v. Nawabi, et al.
as 1:2026cv02328
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
Wahid Nawabi, Henry Albers, Charles Thomas Burbage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Canseco Mejia v. Meal Boy LLC et al
as 3:2026cv01592
Plaintiff:
Yamir Canseco Mejia
Defendant:
Meal Boy LLC and Long Thai
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
LoGiudice v. The Long Island Railroad Company
as 2:2026cv04631
Plaintiff:
Anthony LoGiudice
Defendant:
The Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
United States v. Rashawn Long
as 26-2516
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rashawn Long
Ayyad et al v. Nayax, LLC
as 1:2026cv02946
Plaintiff:
Yaqoub Ayyad and Raymond Long
Defendant:
Nayax, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sosa, Jr. v. The Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2026cv04589
Plaintiff:
Luis Sosa, Jr.
Defendant:
The Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Culbertson v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2026cv13446
Plaintiff:
Nina Zockoff Culbertson
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and The Nellie Mae Education Foundation, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe (GT) v. Rausch et al
as 3:2026cv01066
Plaintiff:
John Doe (GT)
Defendant:
David B. Rausch and Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Lamont et al
as 3:2026cv01189
Petitioner:
Jason Howard
Respondent:
Ned Lamont, Angel Quiros, Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
