Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cain v. Bladen County et al
as 7:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
William Colt Cain
Defendant:
N C Bladen County, James A. McVicker, Michael Hal Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Vance County, North Carolina et al
as 5:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Vance County Sheriff, Vance County Sheriff Dept., N C Vance County and others
Plaintiff:
Justin White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dillon v. Mills, et al
as 4:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Steve Allen Dillon
Defendant:
J. L. Mills, N. C. Judicial System, Pitt County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. N. C. State Dept. of Human and Health, et al
as 5:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Wendell M. Turner
Defendant:
N. C. State Dept. of Human and Health and State of North Carolina Gov.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Albemarle Teen Challenge v. Elizabeth City, City of, N. C.
as 2:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Albemarle Teen Challenge and Albemarle Teen Challenge
Defendant:
Elizabeth City, City of, N. C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Albemarle Teen Challenge v. Elizabeth City, City of, N. C.
as 4:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Albemarle Teen Challenge
Defendant:
Elizabeth City, City of, N. C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams et al v.The City of Raleigh, North Carolina
as 5:2007cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jerry nmi Adams, Jerry nmi Adams, Nebraska Baker and others
Defendant:
Raleigh, City of, N. C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
