Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Harper v. Taylor, et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Michael Taylor, Jr., J. Carey, J. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windsor v. Campos et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Prince' Amelio Mason Windsor, I and Maximus Windor-Mountbatten
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Campos, S. Renn, B. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Brandon Murdock James
Defendant:
Ray Peters, L. Campos, Donald W. Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slight v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00925
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Sue Washburn, C. Kairos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Slight, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Rodriguez v. Brigette Amsberry, et al
as 20-36027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JASON RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BROWN, D. PEDRO, E. ANDERSON and others
Jonathan Rodriguez v. Brigitte Amsberry, et al
as 20-36028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JASON RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK SERRANO, S. BROWN, POPE and others
Daniel Matthews v. J. Taylor, et al
as 20-36008
Defendant / Appellee:
T. CHASE, Prescriber at EOCI, H. RILEY, Case Manager at EOCI, N. SOBOTTA, Grievance coordinator at EOCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL J. MATTHEWS
Rodriguez v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2020cv01914
Defendant:
Brady, D. Pedro, Heather Nevil and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jason Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2020cv00602
Defendant:
D. Pedro, Stuart Young, Shannon Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Jeremy Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarabochia v. 2 John Does et al
as 2:2019cv01954
Defendant:
3 John/Jane Does, S. Lilienthal, Sgt. Longhorn and others
Plaintiff:
Loren Christopher Tarabochia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
