Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Braga v. N.Y.C. Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv02602
Defendant:
New York City Transit Bureau, Transit Adjudication Authority Bureau and N.Y.C. Police Department
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Lee Braga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felton et al v. N.Y.C. Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv04998
Defendant:
Chris Brandwell, Colin Grunnum, Jane Doe 1-200 and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Felton
A Minor:
L.J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hackshaw v. Urquiaga et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hackshaw
Defendant:
Paul Urquiaga, Barrett, New York City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerez v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv07208
Plaintiff:
Candido Jerez
Defendant:
John Doe and N.Y.C. Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Conroy et al
as 1:2012cv05505
Plaintiff:
David Ortiz
Defendant:
Francis Conroy, Jason Nachtrab, Edwin Feliciano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. New York City et al
as 1:2012cv02179
Plaintiff:
Clive Campbell
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv05422
Plaintiff:
Clive C. Campbell
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Police Officer, John Doe #2, Police Officer, John Doe #3, Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lont v. N.Y.C. Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv04528
Defendant:
P.O. SGT. Faison, Highway Patrol P.O. Velez, N.Y.C. Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jozef R. Lont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv06137
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Richardson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Brain Fischer, Parez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
