Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CHRUSTOWSKI v. NAACP et al
as 1:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
RENEE A. CHRUSTOWSKI
Defendant:
NAACP, 80EIGHTY, LGND SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EMRIT v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS et al
as 2:2023cv02119
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. et al v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2020cv10753
Plaintiff:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY and TAHESHA WAY
Intervenor Defendant:
DCCC, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY and NAACP NEW JERSEY STATE CONFERENCE
Intervenor:
Atlantic County Democratic Committee
Amicus Curiae:
National Lawyers Guild Labor and Employment and International Committees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY et al v. WAY
as 3:2020cv05990
Defendant:
TAHESHA WAY
Plaintiff:
NAACP NEW JERSEY STATE CONFERENCE, WILLIAM M. RIGGS, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY et al v. WAY
as 2:2020cv05990
Defendant:
TAHESHA WAY
Plaintiff:
NAACP NEW JERSEY STATE CONFERENCE, WILLIAM M. RIGGS and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAIRSTON v. NAACP et al
as 2:2010cv06271
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HAIRSTON
Defendant:
NAACP, KABILI TAYARI, JAMES HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
