Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Enga v. Saul
as 0:2019cv01775
Plaintiff:
Marcus Enga
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Koeck v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv01011
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Koeck
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Crocket v. Saul
as 0:2019cv01020
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Loland Lamont Crocket
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Radel v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv04068
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Radel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Viessman v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv04063
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Joy Lynn Viessman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ortman v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv04049
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Jann Ortman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Flatequal v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv04045
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Nikki R. Flatequal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Springer v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv04030
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Richard Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rathke v. Berryhill
as 5:2019cv05006
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Terry Rathke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
VanWinkle v. Berryhill
as 0:2019cv00145
Plaintiff:
George VanWinkle
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.