Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FREDERICK et al v. NASHVILLE WIRE PRODUCTS et al
as 1:2018cv08954
Defendant:
NASHVILLE WIRE PRODUCTS , ULINE SHIPPING and ABC CORP. 1-3
Plaintiff:
ELVIS FREDERICK and ROXANN FREDERICK
Cross_claimant:
NASHVILLE WIRE PRODUCTS and ULINE SHIPPING
Cross_defendant:
ULINE SHIPPING and NASHVILLE WIRE PRODUCTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nashville Wire Products Manufacturing Company v. Rollin et al
as 3:2016cv00635
Plaintiff:
Nashville Wire Products Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
Kelly Rollin, Jr., Kelly Rollin, Sr. and Bart Durham Injury Law
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Thomas N. Anderson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America , Nashville Wire Products Company's Insurance Plan and Nashville Wire Products Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bass v. Cigna Group Insurance et al
as 3:2011cv00440
Plaintiff:
Ricky E. Bass
Defendant:
Cigna Group Insurance and Nashville Wire Products Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
GPX INTERNATIONAL TIRE V. UNITED STATES
as 11-1107
Amicus Curiae:
Alabama Metal Industries Corporation, American Spring Wire Corp., ArcelorMittal USA, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Allied Industrial & Service Workers Intl. Union, AFL-CIO-CLC, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
GPX International Tire Corporation, Hebei Starbright Tire Co., Ltd., Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
