Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Carr v. Cain
as 3:2013cv00532
Defendant:
Nate Cain
Plaintiff:
Ralph Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Victorian v. Lynn Cooper, et al
as 13-30171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG VICTORIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN COOPER, SECURITY STAFF AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER, TERRY BORDELON and others
McKinley v. Cain
as 2:2012cv02631
Plaintiff:
Otis R McKinley
Defendant:
Nate Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Cain et al
as 2:2012cv02753
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Nate Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00702
Respondent:
Nate Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Ralph Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Cain
as 2:2012cv02508
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Kennedy
Defendant:
Nate Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Noel v. Cain et al
as 2:2012cv02340
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel
Defendant:
Nate Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Cain et al
as 2:2012cv02128
Plaintiff:
Kevin George
Defendant:
Nate Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Victorian v. Cooper et al
as 1:2012cv02001
Plaintiff:
Craig Victorian
Defendant:
Lynn Cooper, Security Staff Avoyelles Correctional Center, Terry Borderlon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford v. Stalder, et al
as 07-30766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D CLIFFORD, also known as Michael J Coleman
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, Nurse Practitioner at EHCC, JOHN DOE, Emergency Medical Technician at EHCC, J DOE, Medical Records Custodian at EHCC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
