Cases
PARKS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv04305
Petitioner: NATHANIEL PARKS
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PARKS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv20362
Petitioner: NATHANIEL PARKS
Respondent: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and GOVENER OF NEW JERSEY PHIL MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62480
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL PARKS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKS v. CFG HEALTH SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv21984
Defendant: GERALDINE COHEN, CHERYL DUBOIS, CFG HEALTH SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivy v. Beckman et al
as 2:2016cv02292
Plaintiff: Shimaaz Ivy
Defendant: Douglas Beckman and Nathaniel Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parks et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06778
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Parks and Rasheeda Adderly
Defendant: The City of New York, Joseph Carrasco, Catherine Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv06020
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Parks
Defendant: The City of New York, John Does 1 through 5 and Jane Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arsenault et al v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al
as 3:2007cv00785
Plaintiff: Shirley Arsenault, Shirley Arsenault, Shirley Arsenault and others
Defendant: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?