Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nathaniel Turner v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 22-2321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and MICHAEL GARVEY, Deputy Managing Director of Office of Forensic Science
TURNER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL TURNER
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and MICHAEL GARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel TurnerIn re: Nathaniel Turner
as 20-1526
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
In re: NATHANIEL TURNER
RAFFERTY et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv04741
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAFFERTY , MILLER FARR , SIMEON RICE and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Nathaniel Turner
as 11-2281
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: NATHANIEL TURNER
Defendant - Respondent:
DEBRA SAVERS
Nathaniel Turner v. Michael Barone, et al
as 10-1916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL BARONE, Superintendent, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
TURNER v. BARONE et al
as 2:2009cv00955
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL TURNER
Respondent:
MICHAEL C. BARONE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TURNER v. BARONE et al
as 1:2008cv00302
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL TURNER
Respondent:
MICHAEL C. BARONE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TURNER et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66491
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL TURNER, JR. and HELEN TURNER
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
