Cases 1 - 5 of 5
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc et al v. Myrtle Beach, City of et al
as 4:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc , Simuel Jones , Leslie Stevenson and others
Defendant:
Myrtle Beach, City of and Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc, The et al v. Molly Darcy Inc
as 4:2011cv01293
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc, The , National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc Conway Branch, The , Lee Edwards and others
Defendant:
Molly Darcy Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc, The et al v. Leftis Foods Inc
as 4:2011cv01295
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc, The , National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc Conway Branch, The , Clayton Brown and others
Defendant:
Leftis Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc et al v. Brooks
as 4:2010cv00440
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inc Conway Branch, Kimberly Anderson and others
Defendant:
Joe Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Friendly Ice Cream Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv03569
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Conway Branch and others
Defendant:
Friendly Ice Cream Corporation, Friendly's Restaurants Franchise LLC, Myrtle Beach Friends Boulevard LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
