Cases 1 - 10 of 664
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant:
AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant:
PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MCNULTY v. AUCHTER INDUSTRIAL VAC SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05391
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCNULTY
Defendant:
AUCHTER INDUSTRIAL VAC SERVICES, INC. , KINDER MORGAN LIQUIDS TERMINAL, LLC , GUZZLER MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION , KINDER MORGAN LIQUIDS TERMINALS, LLC , KINDER MORGAN LIQUIDS TERMINAL, LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION , KINDER MORGAN LIQUIDS TERMINALS, LLC , KINDER MORGAN LIQUIDS TERMINAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
MORTIMER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04169
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. MORTIMER and CHERYL MORTIMER
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AMTICO and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS CO. , NAPA , QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AMTICO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
KROH v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63479
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE & FOUNDRY CO., AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE CO and others
Plaintiff:
JUDITH VIRGINIA KROH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMAS v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63477
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE & FOUNDRY CO., AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE CO and others
Plaintiff:
IRENE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SPINNEY v. PITTSBURG-CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83517
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SPINNEY and LILLIAN CALOS
Defendant:
PITTSBURG-CORNING CORP. , RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION , A C & S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIGEL et al v. AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv68626
Defendant:
PROKO INDUSTRIES, INC., GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SIGEL and ELAYNE SIGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
