Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MEDIA APPLICATION FOR AUDIOVISUAL ACCESS TO TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. DONALD J. TRUMP
as 1:2023mc00099
In Re:
MEDIA APPLICATION FOR AUDIOVISUAL ACCESS TO TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. DONALD J. TRUMP and APPLICATION OF NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC TO PERMIT VIDEO AND AUDIO OF TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN UNITED STATES V. DONALD TRUMP
Interested Party:
MEDIA COALITION
Petitioner:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC and REUTERS NEWS & MEDIA INC.
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE APPLICATION OF NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC TO PERMIT VIDEO AND AUDIO OF TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN UNITED STATES V. DONALD TRUMP et al
as 1:2023mc00107
In Re:
APPLICATION OF NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC TO PERMIT VIDEO AND AUDIO OF TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN UNITED STATES V. DONALD TRUMP
Petitioner:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNITY SERVICE RECORDS et al
as 1:2021mc00166
In Re:
PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNITY SERVICE RECORDS
Petitioner:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC. doing business as ABC NEWS, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Respondent:
LORI VINSON and THOMAS VINSON
MEADOWS v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2021cv03217
Plaintiff:
MARK MEADOWS
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Intervenor:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
IN RE PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00084
Petitioner:
BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, GANNETT CO., INC., NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
IN RE: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00086
Petitioner:
BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
IN RE: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00087
Petitioner:
BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
IN RE: PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS IN THE CAPITOL RIOT CASES
as 1:2021mc00046
Petitioner:
BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS IN THE CAPITOL RIOT CASES
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN RE: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
as 1:2021mc00034
Petitioner:
BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
