Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Allison v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Allison
Defendant:
James M. Neal, Tyler J. Griffin, City of Bridgeport, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LAUDERDALE v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, TONY SKINNER, SHERIFF, CANTEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Valencia v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Mysti Valencia
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Jason Nowatzke, Christopher Beal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Village of Homewood et al
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Neal Price
Defendant:
Village of Homewood, Homewood Police Department, Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robbins v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Mr. Steven L Robbins and Steven L Robbins
Defendant:
Mr. Ron Neal, Mr. Dylan Cabanaw, Mr. THOMAS FRAZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
