Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Nesbitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Princeton Neal Nesbitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00771
Plaintiff:
Marcia D Neal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Neal v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv01102
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Toinette Yvonne Neal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Zinda, Neal v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2019cv00931
Plaintiff:
Neal P. Zinda
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Neal v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv01505
Plaintiff:
Tiffany L Neal and Tiffiny L Neal
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
O'Neal v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv03926
Plaintiff:
Martrez G. O'Neal
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
NEAL v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01690
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
LATANYA WHITE NEAL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cannon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Neal Cannon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOLLIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01322
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
GREGORY NEAL HOLLIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
