Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,640
Muzumala v. Unknown Federal Agents
as 24-1267
Plaintiff: JOSHUA MUZUMALA, -
Defendant: UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS, JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Samuel Bahreini v. Paul Zsebedics
as 24-1411
Plaintiff: SAMUEL BAHREINI
Defendant: PAUL ZSEBEDICS, AL SIVICK, MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Zaslavsky v. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2367
Plaintiff: NEAL S. ZASLAVSKY, ATTORNEY, an individual
Defendant: CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES, a California non-profit corporation, MINH TRI NGUYEN, an individual, IBIERE SECK, an individual and others
Neal v. Barrett, et al.
as 24-2403
Plaintiff: ISAIAH S. NEAL
Defendant: Secretary BARBARA M. BARRETT, FRANK KENDALL, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60280
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02929
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff: JOSE SHOMO
Defendant: STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Foster v. Price
as 24-587
Plaintiff: TABATHA FOSTER
Defendant: NEAL EVAN PRICE and LARNELL PALMER
Precision Tube Bending v. Excelsior, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Precision Tube Bending
Defendant: EXCELSIOR, LLC, Trustee Mary A. Hunt, Trustee Jeffrey E Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?