Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Neal v. USA
as 1:2016cv01767
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sir Alexander Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stephenson-Neal v. Human Touch Health Care Agency, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01668
Defendant:
Human Touch Health Care Agency, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Stephenson-Neal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Leal Martinez v. Woman Based Whatever it Takes Company, Inc et al
as 1:2016cv01398
Defendant:
Woman Based Whatever it Takes Company, Inc and Neal Matez
Plaintiff:
Efren Leal Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
O'Neal v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Fremont et al
as 1:2016cv01005
Plaintiff:
Carolyn O'Neal
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Fremont, The , James Beicker , TY Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Neal v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Scott and Michelle Neal
Defendant:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neal, et al v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
Scott Neal and Michelle Neal
Defendant:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Clatt et al v. Covidien LP
as 1:2015cv02084
Plaintiff:
Bret Clatt , Benjamin Neal Jenkins , Jerrime Mata Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Covidien LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
O'Neal et al v. City of Holyoke et al
as 1:2015cv01464
Petitioner:
Rupert R. O'Neal and Claire M. O'Neal
Defendant:
City of Holyoke, The
Respondent:
Alvin R. Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saxton et al v. Lucas et al
as 1:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Laura Saxton and Doug Schelling
Defendant:
Donthe Lucas, Sara Lucas, Vivian Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
