Cases 41 - 50 of 58
IN RE SUBPOENA IN
as 1:2012mc00569
Petitioner:
NEAL A. ROBERTS
Respondent:
PACKARD PACKARD & JOHNSON and DOES 1 THRU 100
Movant:
DONALD WILLIAMSON
FONSECA v. SALMINEN et al
as 1:2012cv01469
Plaintiff:
LUIS A. FONSECA
Defendant:
ERIC NEAL SALMINEN and ASBESTOS SPECIALISTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01424
Petitioner:
FRED NEAL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NEAL v. KANE
as 1:2012cv01212
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. NEAL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LECG CORPORATION et al v. ABDALA et al
as 1:2012cv01101
Plaintiff:
LECG CORPORATION , LECG LLC and LECG CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN COMMITTEE
Defendant:
NEAL B. LAWSON , DANIEL L. REGARD , EDWARD F. SHERRY and others
Counter_claimant:
DANIEL L. REGARD and NEAL B. LAWSON
Counter_defendant:
LECG CORPORATION, LECG CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN COMMITTEE , LECG LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HESTERLEE v. GREEN et al
as 1:2012cv01047
Plaintiff:
NEAL FRANKLIN HESTERLEE, SR.
Defendant:
MAUREEN GREEN and UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
GARMON v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR et al
as 1:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
DAVID G. GARMON
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, SOUTHEAST REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY, JOSEPH NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
LINDA NEAL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON et al v. VILSACK
as 1:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
ANNIE JOHNSON , BETTY ABNEY , BARBARA ABRAMS and others
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
