Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Fisher v. Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sally Fisher
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Andrew Ginther, Ned Pettus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Steiner v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03107
Plaintiff:
Ned Steiner
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Spragling et al v. 7-Eleven. Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ned Spragling and Dawn Spragling
Defendant:
7-Eleven, 7-Eleven, Inc., Unknown Owner/Manager/Franchisee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Waterstone Property Management, LLC, et al
as 1:2021cv00977
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Davis
Defendant:
Ned Wasserstein, Catherine Wasserstein and Waterstone Property Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grassman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
NED D GRASSMAN
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
