Cases 1 - 10 of 13
George v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Destined George
Defendant:
Sgt. Neely, Lt. Williams, Lt. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgado v. Neely
as 2:2023cv00484
Petitioner:
Virginia M. Bourdet Delgado
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert, Boyd, Unit Manager Larry Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Unnamed, Lt. G. Adams, B. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ofori et al v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00587
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Stephens, Anthony Roberts, Waverly Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dehate v. Virginia Beach Correctional Center et al
as 1:2014cv01386
Petitioner:
Ricky James Dehate
Respondent:
Virginia Beach Correctional Center, Inmate Violation Report, A. L. Meredith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neely v. Clarke
as 2:2013cv00274
Petitioner:
Demetrius L. Neely
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bartz v. Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
William J. Bartz, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Dean Lewis, William H. Ledbetter, Dixon L. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Vargas et al
as 1:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
Santee Joseph Blair
Defendant:
K Vargas, J. Gibbs, T. Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. HIGGS et al
as 2:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, Phil Grines, Scott Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
