Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18873
Plaintiff:
NEIL WALLACE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01773
Plaintiff:
NEIL WALLACE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67154
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NEIL WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Portland Terminal Railroad Co. et al
as 3:2016cv01458
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co., Portland Terminal Railroad Co. and Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Plaintiff:
Neil Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Williams Hicks, et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 16-15370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAMS MICHAEL HICKS, KENNETH HARMS, as Class Representative Plaintiffs and Individual Plaintiffs, MATTHEW ACHATZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PGA TOUR, INC.
Wallace v. Quarantillo et al
as 1:2015cv00936
Plaintiff:
O'Neil Wallace
Defendant:
Andrea Quarantillo, Roger Sagerman, Laura A. Michalec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
William Michael Hicks , Kenneth Harms , Matthew Achatz and others
Defendant:
PGA Tour, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Wallace v. Holder
as 1:2012cv03382
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Petitioner:
O'Neil Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. LaClair
as 1:2012cv02117
Respondent:
Superintendent Darwin LaClair
Petitioner:
O'Neil Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Artu
as 11-1711
Petitioner - Appellant:
Neil Wallace
Respondent - Appellee:
Dale Artus, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
