Cases
ESTATE OF CATHERINE O'BOYLE et al v. BRAVERMAN et al
as 1:2012cv06153
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF CATHERINE O'BOYLE , MARTIN O'BOYLE , NEW MIDLAND PLAZA ASSOCIATES and others
Defendant: DAVID L. BRAVERMAN , ESQUI and BRAVERMAN KASKEY, PC
Counter_claimant: BRAVERMAN KASKEY, PC and DAVID L. BRAVERMAN , ESQUI
Counter_defendant: COMMERCE PARTNERSHIP NO. 1147 , COMMERCE PARTNERSHIP NO. 1171 , NEW MIDLAND PLAZA ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin O'Boyle, et al v. Schulman, Rogers, Gandal Pordy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5551
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARTIN E. O'BOYLE, Individually and as General Partner in New Midland Plaza Associates, CATHERINE O'BOYLE, Individually and as General Partner in New Midland Plaza Associates, NEW MIDLAND PLAZA ASSOCIATES and others
Defendant - Appellee: SCHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL PORDY & ECKER, P.A., ROSS D. COOPER and MARK S. GUBERMAN
O'Boyle et al v. Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00169
Plaintiff: Martin E O'Boyle, Martin E O'Boyle, Catherine O'Boyle and others
Defendant: Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A., Ross D Cooper and Mark S Guberman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Catherine O'Boyle, et al v. David Braverman, et al
as 08-3865
Plaintiff - Appellant: CATHERINE O'BOYLE and MARTIN E. O'BOYLE, individually and a a General Partner in New Midland Plaza Associates, a Tennessee General Partnership, and as General Partner in Commerce Partnership No. 1147, a Florida General Partnership, and as Partnership No. 1171, a Florida Genera
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID L. BRAVERMAN
Defendant: BRAVERMAN & KASKEY, a New Jersey and Pennsylvania Professional Corporation,, FKA Braverman, Daniels, Kaskey, FKA Fellheimer, Braverman & Kaskey

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?