Cases 1 - 10 of 26
US v. Olayeye
as 25-2022
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
YOMI JONES OLAYEYE, a/k/a Sabbie
Interested Party:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT and others
Kairos Credit Strategies Operating Partnership, LP v. The Friars National Association, Inc.
as 24-1797
Plaintiff:
KAIROS CREDIT STRATEGIES OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP
Defendant:
THE FRIARS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC., CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
US v. Omoruyi
as 24-1561
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
OSARETIN GODSPOWER OMORUYI, a/k/a Bright Nelson, a/k/a Nelson Bright
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
US v. Omoruyi
as 24-1562
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
OSAKPAMWAN HENRY OMORUYI, a/k/a Clifford Bernard, a/k/a Bernard Clifford
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
US v. Omoruyi
as 23-1957
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
OSARETIN GODSPOWER OMORUYI, a/k/a Bright Nelson, a/k/a Nelson Bright
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
US v. Omoruyi
as 23-1956
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
OSAKPAMWAN HENRY OMORUYI, a/k/a Clifford Bernard, a/k/a Bernard Clifford
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Kairos Credit Strategies Operating Partnership, LP, v. The Friars National Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02960
Plaintiff:
KAIROS CREDIT STRATEGIES OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP
Defendant:
THE FRIARS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC., CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Cross Claimant:
HOTEL RESTAURANT & CLUB EMPLOYEES AND BARTENDERS UNION LOCAL 6 AND CLUB EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND
Cross Defendant:
Kairos Credit Strategies Operating Partnership, LP,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fc Diversity - Foreclosure
Oriska Corporation v. Troy Operating Co. LLC
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Troy Operating Co. LLC, (Diamond) Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC
as 22-1155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Highgate LTC Management, LLC, Employer-Defendant, DBA Northwoods Rehabilitaion & Extended Care, Eugene Nachamkin, Owner-Defendant, Diana R. Koehler, Owner-Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
